Ohio Highlights

33 Ohio's 2019 Rank
To learn more about state rank, visit our 2019 Scorecard on State Health System Performance.
See More
Source: Commonwealth Fund 2019

Key Demographics

Ohio US Average
Total Population 11,485,462 320,842,721
Median Household Income $59,964 $65,727
Below 200% of Federal Poverty Level (FPL) 31% 31%
% White Race, Non-Hispanic 79% 61%
% Black Race, Non-Hispanic 12% 12%
% Other Race, Non-Hispanic 5% 9%
% Hispanic Ethnicity 4% 18%

Key Health Policies in Ohio

Ohio has put no rules in place to promote ACA marketplace competition.
Ohio does not have stricter limits than the federal government on the sale of short-term coverage.
Ohio expanded Medicaid.

Ohio Performance Data

CSV
Indicator Source 2015 2016 2017
<p>Uninsured adults ages 19-64</p> American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample (ACS PUMS) 9% 8% 8%
Uninsured children ages 0-18 American Community Survey, Public Use Microdata Sample (ACS PUMS) 4% 4% 4%
Hospital admissions for pediatric asthma, per 100,000 children ages 2-17 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), via AHRQ National Healthcare Quality Report 102.3 - -
Adults age 18 and older who went without care because of cost in past year Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 11% 11% 11%
Adults age 18 and older with a usual source of care Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 82% 83% 81%
Adults age 18 and older without a dental visit in past year Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) - 15% -
Adults with age- and gender-appropriate cancer screenings Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) - 67% -
Adults with age-appropriate vaccines Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 36% 37% 39%
Adults ages 18-64 who report fair or poor health Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 14% 16% 17%
Adults ages 18 and older who smoke Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 22% 23% 21%
Adults ages 18-64 who are obese (BMI >= 30) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 30% 32% 35%
Adults ages 18-64 who have lost six or more teeth because of tooth decay, infection, or gum disease Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) - 14% -
<p>Mortality amenable to health care, deaths per 100,000 population</p> CDC National Vital Statistics System (NVSS): Restricted Use Mortality Microdata 95.4 95.9 -
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), Standardized Infection Ratio CDC Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI) Progress Report 0.882 0.836 -
Breast cancer deaths per 100,000 female population CDC National Vital Statistics System (NVSS): WONDER 22.8 21.6 22
Colorectal cancer deaths per 100,000 population CDC National Vital Statistics System (NVSS): WONDER 15.3 15 14.3
Suicide deaths per 100,000 population CDC National Vital Statistics System (NVSS): WONDER 13.9 14.2 14.8
Alcohol-related deaths per 100,000 population CDC National Vital Statistics System (NVSS): WONDER 7.6 8.3 8.9
Drug poisoning deaths per 100,000 population CDC National Vital Statistics System (NVSS): WONDER 29.9 39.1 46.3
Infant mortality, deaths per 1,000 live births CDC National Vital Statistics System (NVSS): WONDER 7.2 7.4 -
Hospital admissions among adults ages 18-64 with employer-sponsored insurance for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, per 1,000 enrollees Truven MarketScan 5.3 7.3 -
Hospital admissions among Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, per 1,000 beneficiaries Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW), via CMS Geographic Variation Public Use File 52.8 49 50.6
Potentially avoidable emergency department visits among adults ages 18-64 with employer-sponsored insurance per 1,000 enrollees Truven MarketScan 177 158.3 -
Potentially avoidable emergency department visits among Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older per 1,000 beneficiaries Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW), via CMS Geographic Variation Public Use File 230.2 - -
30-day hospital readmissions among adults ages 18-64 with employer-sponsored insurance, per 1,000 enrollees Truven MarketScan 3.4 3.2 -
30-day hospital readmissions among Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older per 1,000 beneficiaries Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW), via CMS Geographic Variation Public Use File 46.5 45 46
Individuals under age 65 with high out-of-pocket medical costs relative to their annual household income Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) 10% 9% -
Total Medicare (Parts A & B) reimbursements per enrollee Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW), via CMS Geographic Variation Public Use File $9,618 $9,607 $9,862
Total Medicare reimbursements for inpatient hospital services per enrollee Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW), via CMS Geographic Variation Public Use File $2,688 $2,707 $2,791
Total Medicare reimbursements for ambulatory Evaluation and Management services per enrollee Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW), via CMS Geographic Variation Public Use File $944 $922 $940
Total Medicare reimbursements for inpatient skilled nursing care per enrollee Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW), via CMS Geographic Variation Public Use File $1,138 $1,052 $1,012
Total Medicare reimbursements for home health care services per enrollee Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse (CCW), via CMS Geographic Variation Public Use File $533 $528 $531
<p>Home health patients who got better at walking or moving around</p> Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS), via CMS home Health Compare 67% 71% 74%
Home health patients whose wounds improved or healed after an operation Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS), via CMS home Health Compare 88% 88% 88%
Home health patients also enrolled in Medicare with a hospital admission Medicare Claims, via CMS Home Health Compare 16% 17% 16%
Risk-adjusted 30-day mortality among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, or stroke CMS Hospital Compare - - -
Hospitalized patients given information about what to do during their recovery at home Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS), via CMS Hospital Compare 89% 89% 89%
Overall patient hospital experience rating (out of 100 points) Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS), via CMS Hospital Compare 73 - -
Patients' experience communicating with nursing staff (out of 100 points) Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS), via CMS Hospital Compare 81 - -
Patients' experience communicating with doctors (out of 100 points) Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS), via CMS Hospital Compare 80 - -
Responsiveness of hospital staff when called by patients (out of 100 points) Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS), via CMS Hospital Compare 67 - -
Patients' experience communicating with hospital staff about medicines they received (out of 100 points) Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS), via CMS Hospital Compare 64 - -
Patients felt prepared to manage their care after a hospital stay (out of 100 points) Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS), via CMS Hospital Compare 52 - -
Patients discussed discharge plans with hospital staff and received written instructions (out of 100 points) Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS), via CMS Hospital Compare 89 - -
Hospitals with overall patient experience ratings higher than the national average Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS), via CMS Hospital Compare 62% - -
Adult diabetic patients ages 18-64 with employer-sponsored insurance with at least one hemoglobin A1c test during the year Truven MarketScan 81.6% 88% -
Adult diabetic patients ages 18-64 with employer-sponsored insurance with at least one LDL-C test during the year Truven MarketScan 73.7% 79.3% -
Adult patients ages 18-64 with employer-sponsored insurance and a diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia who received an appropriate empiric antibiotic Truven MarketScan 70.5% 75.9% -
Adult patients ages 18-64 with employer-sponsored insurance and a diagnosis of major depression who were prescribed an antidepressant medication, and who had pharmacy claims of at least 5 months' worth of the medication Truven MarketScan 59.9% 59.5% -
Adult patients ages 18-50 with employer-sponsored insurance who had a new primary diagnosis of low back pain with an Imaging study (plain X-ray, MRI, or CT scan) within 28 days of the diagnosis Truven MarketScan 68.4% 66.7% -
Total employer-sponsored insurance reimbursements per enrollee, ages 18-64 Truven MarketScan $4,770 $4,696 -
Total employer-sponsored insurance reimbursements for inpatient hospital services per enrollee, ages 18-64 Truven MarketScan $1,291 $1,290 -
Total employer-sponsored insurance reimbursements for physician office services per enrollee, ages 18-64 Truven MarketScan $393 $386 -
Short-stay nursing home residents with a 30-day readmission to the hospital Residential History File 20% - -
Long-stay nursing home residents with a hospital admission Residential History File 12% - -
Medicare beneficiaries who received at least one drug that should be avoided in the elderly Medicare Part D Claims 11% - -
Total premium cost for employer-sponsored health insurance plans Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) $14,382 $14,853 $15,255
Total premium cost for employer-sponsored health insurance plans as a share of state median income Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) 25.2% 24.7% 24.6%
Employee contribution to total premium cost for employer-sponsored health insurance plans Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) $3,150 $3,347 $3,542
Employee contribution to total premium cost for employer-sponsored health insurance plans as a share of state median income Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) 5.5% 5.6% 5.7%
Employee deductible for employer-sponsored health insurance plans Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) $2,486 $2,801 $3,021
Employee deductible for employer-sponsored health insurance plans as a share of state median income Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) 4.4% 4.7% 4.9%
Employee total potential out-of-pocket medical costs (premium contribution + deductible) Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) $5,636 $6,147 $6,563
Employee total potential out-of-pocket medical costs (premium contribution + deductible) as a share of state median income Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component (MEPS-IC) 9.9% 10.2% 10.6%
Children ages 19-35 months who received all recommended doses of seven key vaccines National Immunization Survey (NIS) 68% 68% -
Children ages 10-17 who are overweight or obese (BMI >= 85th percentile) National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) 33% 32% -
Children ages 0-17 with all components of a medical home National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) 52% 55% -
Children with age-appropriate medical and dental preventive care visits in the past year National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) 68% 64% -
Children ages 3-17 who received treatment or counseling from a mental health professional when needed during the past 12 months National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) 85% 77% -
Adults age 18 and older with any mental illness reporting unmet need National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), via State of Mental Health in America - - -
Adults age and older with any mental illness who did not receive treatment National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), via State of Mental Health in America - - -
Long-stay nursing home residents with an antipsychotic medication Minimum Dataset (MDS), via CMS Nursing Home Compare 20% 18% 16%
High-risk nursing home residents with pressure sores Minimum Dataset (MDS), via CMS Nursing Home Compare 5.6% 5.1% 4.9%

Ohio Policy Data

CSV
Policy Source Action Taken Notes Info
<p>Medicaid expansion status</p> The Commonwealth Fund 1 Traditionally expanded Medicaid -
<p>Medicaid work requirement status</p> The Commonwealth Fund 1 Work requirement waiver approved -
<p>Affordable Care Act health insurance marketplace type</p> Center on Health Insurance Reforms, Georgetown University Health Policy Institute 2 Federally facilitated marketplace; state conducting plan management The federal government (HHS) is legally responsible for all marketplace functions, but defers to the state to conduct health plan management. Individuals must use HealthCare.gov to enroll in coverage.
State-operated individual market reinsurance programs supported by federal funding from an ACA innovation waiver J. Giovannelli, K. Lucia, and S. Corlette, "To Understand How Consumers Are Faring in the Individual Health Insurance Markets, Watch the States." The Commonwealth Fund 0 State does not operate a reinsurance program Has not applied for a future waiver
State requirements for individuals to maintain adequate health coverage (individual mandates)                                               J. Giovannelli, K. Lucia, and S. Corlette, "To Understand How Consumers Are Faring in the Individual Health Insurance Markets, Watch the States." The Commonwealth Fund 0 No state requirement for individuals to maintain adequate health coverage -
State subsidies for individual market coverage                  J. Giovannelli, K. Lucia, and S. Corlette, "To Understand How Consumers Are Faring in the Individual Health Insurance Markets, Watch the States." The Commonwealth Fund 0 State does not provide premium or cost-sharing subsidies for individual market coverage -
<p>State regulation of short-term limited duration coverage&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> J. Giovannelli, K. Lucia, and S. Corlette, "To Understand How Consumers Are Faring in the Individual Health Insurance Markets, Watch the States." The Commonwealth Fund 0 State does not have stricter limits than the federal government on the sale of short-term coverage -
<p>State decisions to extend the annual open enrollment period for ACA marketplace coverage&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> J. Giovannelli, K. Lucia, and S. Corlette, "To Understand How Consumers Are Faring in the Individual Health Insurance Markets, Watch the States." The Commonwealth Fund 0 State did not extend the open enrollment period for 2018 coverage and has not yet announced an extension for 2019 enrollment period -
<p>Rules to a promote competitive marketplace&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> J. Giovannelli, K. Lucia, and S. Corlette, "To Understand How Consumers Are Faring in the Individual Health Insurance Markets, Watch the States." The Commonwealth Fund 0 State has not established rules to promote a competitive ACA marketplace -
State decisions regarding whether to allow non-compliant transitional policies in the individual market J. Giovannelli, K. Lucia, and S. Corlette, "To Understand How Consumers Are Faring in the Individual Health Insurance Markets, Watch the States." The Commonwealth Fund 1 State permits insurers to sell non-compliant transitional policies in the individual market -
<p>State decisions to exempt other coverage products from federal and state consumer protections</p> J. Giovannelli, K. Lucia, and S. Corlette, "To Understand How Consumers Are Faring in the Individual Health Insurance Markets, Watch the States." The Commonwealth Fund 0 State does not exempt other coverage products from federal and state rules for individual market insurance -
<p>Status of state Affordable Care Act innovation waivers</p> J. Giovannelli and K. Lucia, "States See Opportunities for Flexibility in the ACA’s Innovation Waiver Program." The Commonwealth Fund 4 Waiver withdrawn from federal consideration/no longer under active federal review Waiver application submitted to the federal government on March 30, 2018. Application failed preliminary federal review (application missing required elements) on May 17, 2018 and has not been resubmitted by the state. Recent changes in federal law reduced to $0 the tax penalty for individuals who do not maintain health coverage, but did not eliminate the individual mandate requirement itself. The state’s application sought to waive, beginning in 2019, the individual mandate requirement.